Kellogg to remove artificial dyes from its cereals by 2027 — but is it just theater?

08/19/2025 / By Ava Grace

WK Kellogg Co. will remove all artificial dyes from its cereals by 2027 due to a binding legal agreement with Texas AG Ken Paxton, targeting school cereals first by 2026.
The move follows scrutiny of dyes like Red No. 40 and Blue No. 1, linked to hyperactivity in children, though Kellogg acted only after years of selling dyed products in the U.S. while removing them in Europe.
While competitors like General Mills also shift to “cleaner” labels, skeptics argue synthetic dyes are a distraction from unlabeled toxins (e.g., glyphosate, heavy metals) that pose greater health risks.
Some studies suggest dyes may worsen ADHD, but the FDA considers them safe for most. Red No. 3 (linked to thyroid cancer in rats) was recently banned — though Kellogg claims it hasn’t used it in decades.
Critics argue protesting cereal dyes ignores graver issues like vaccine injuries, pesticide exposure and global crises (e.g., Gaza), calling the focus on Kellogg’s “virtue signaling” rather than systemic change.

In a move that has reignited debates over food safety and corporate accountability, WK Kellogg Co. has announced it will eliminate all artificial dyes from its cereals by 2027. The decision, spurred by a binding agreement with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, marks a significant shift for the maker of Froot Loops and Apple Jacks — brands long criticized for their synthetic, petroleum-based colorings. But while activists cheer, critics argue the fight over food dyes distracts from far graver threats to public health, from vaccine injuries to industrial toxins hidden in everyday foods.

The legal crackdown on synthetic dyes

Texas AG Ken Paxton’s office spent months investigating Kellogg’s use of artificial dyes like FD&C Red No. 40 and Blue No. 1, which, though FDA-approved, have faced scrutiny for potential links to hyperactivity in children. The resulting legal agreement forces Kellogg to reformulate its products, with school cereals dye-free by 2026 and all retail products by 2027. While Kellogg insists this aligns with its “health-forward” mission, skeptics note the company only acted under legal duress after years of selling brightly colored cereals in the U.S. while removing dyes in Europe. (Related: RFK Jr. gives food companies two years to remove harmful artificial dyes.)

A trend or a trap?

Kellogg isn’t alone. Competitors like General Mills and Kraft Heinz have pledged similar changes, responding to consumer demand for “cleaner” labels. Yet critics argue these reforms are largely performative. Synthetic dyes, while controversial, are at least transparently listed on packaging — unlike glyphosate residues or heavy metals in produce, which evade labels entirely. The focus on dyes, they say, lets corporations off the hook for more insidious toxins while appeasing activists with superficial wins.

The science behind the scare

Artificial dyes are derived from petroleum and coal tar, a fact that alarms many parents. Some studies, including a landmark 2007 U.K. report, suggested dyes might exacerbate ADHD symptoms in sensitive children. Yet the FDA maintains they’re safe for most people, and even the European Union — which requires warning labels — hasn’t banned them outright. Meanwhile, Red No. 3, linked to thyroid cancer in rats, was banned in foods this year — but Kellogg claims it hasn’t used the dye in decades.

Bigger fish to fry

While activists rally against cereal dyes, broader food safety crises go ignored. Pesticides like glyphosate, endocrine-disrupting plastics and aluminum adjuvants in vaccines — all with documented health risks — rarely spark protests of this scale. Radio host Shannon Joy recently lambasted the Kellogg’s boycott as “virtue signaling,” urging activists to target Pfizer over vaccine injuries instead. Others point to Gaza’s humanitarian crisis, asking why marching against Froot Loops takes precedence over life-and-death issues.

A distraction or a victory?

Kellogg’s dye ban is a win for transparency, but it’s hardly the revolution activists claim. In a world where children face war, pharmaceutical risks and unlabeled chemical exposures, protesting cereal colors seems myopic. As Paxton hails his legal victory, consumers should ask: Why stop at dyes when the food system’s real dangers remain unchecked? The answer may lie in corporate convenience — after all, swapping dyes is easier than dismantling an industry built on hidden poisons.

Watch the Health Ranger Mike Adams talk about breakfast cereal.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.